Why revisit Sutton v O'Kane? The tricky trio : supervening fraud; the in personam claim; and landlocked land / by Elizabeth Toomey

About this item

Title

Why revisit Sutton v O'Kane? The tricky trio : supervening fraud; the in personam claim; and landlocked land / by Elizabeth Toomey

Content partner

National Library of New Zealand

Collection

Index New Zealand

Description

Analyses two decisions concerning supervening fraud and access to land : 'Sutton v O'Kane' [1973] 2 NZLR 304, and the New South Wales Court of Appeal case 'McGrath v Campbell' [2006] NSWCA 180. Shuffles the principles involved in a contemporary context and makes a case for the parties. Considers how the Suttons would fare under an in personam claim or how the McGraths would fare under supervening fraud. Speculates on whether Mr O'Kane and the Campbells would be successful applicants under ...

Read more

Format

Journal

Date created

2007

Creator

Toomey, Elizabeth,, 1951-, (University of Canterbury, School of Law)

URL

http://natlib.govt.nz/records/21448529

Related subjects

Right of property -- Law and legislation / Property -- Interpretation and construction / Impossibility of performance / Case studies

What is the copyright status of this item?

All Rights Reserved

This item is all rights reserved, which means you'll have to get permission from National Library of New Zealand before using it.

What can I do with this item?

You must always check with National Library of New Zealand to confirm the specific terms of use, but this is our understanding:

Non-infringing use

NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.

No sharing

You may not copy and/or share this item with others without further permission. This includes posting it on your blog, using it in a presentation, or any other public use.

No modifying

You are not allowed to adapt or remix this item into any other works.

No commercial use

You may not use this item commercially.