Research paper
The Kate Valley Landfill dispute - an analysis of the avoidability of conflict when siting local unpopular land uses
About this item
- Title
- The Kate Valley Landfill dispute - an analysis of the avoidability of conflict when siting local unpopular land uses
- Content partner
- Lincoln University
- Collection
- Lincoln University Research Archive
- Description
This dissertation examines the extent to which conflict can be avoided when siting local unpopular land uses (LULU's), focusing on the proposed Kate Valley Landfill in Canterbury. The dissertation outlines the background to the Kate Valley Landfill conflict, and then explores the idea that some issues within a conflict may be non-negotiable. The study then goes on to examine the argument that most typical NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) issues are potentially negotiable, outlines Alternative Envi...
- Format
- Research paper
- Research format
- Thesis
- Thesis level
- Masters
- Date created
- 2003
- Creator
- Dever, Belinda L.
- URL
- https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4701
- Related subjects
- Kate Valley Landfill / North Canterbury / Hurunui District / conflict / disputes / NIMBY / conflict resolution / Environment Canterbury / Alternative Environmental Dispute Resolution (AEDR) / land use / constructive confrontation / intractable values / New Zealand / environmental policy
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 24 July 2012, and updated 17 March 2026.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
What is the copyright status of this item?
All Rights Reserved
This item is all rights reserved, which means you'll have to get permission from Lincoln University before using it.
More Information
Lincoln University has this to say about the rights status of this item:
Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available. (With the exceptions noted in http://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/page/rights, this metadata is available under a Creative Commons Zero license.)
You can learn more about the rights status of this item at: https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights/en
What can I do with this item?
You must always check with Lincoln University to confirm the specific terms of use, but this is our understanding:
Non-infringing use
NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.
No sharing
You may not copy and/or share this item with others without further permission. This includes posting it on your blog, using it in a presentation, or any other public use.
No modifying
You are not allowed to adapt or remix this item into any other works.
No commercial use
You may not use this item commercially.
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 24 July 2012, and updated 17 March 2026.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
Related items
Loading...