Research paper
Proportionate universalism in practice? A quasi-experimental study (GoWell) of a UK neighbourhood renewal programme’s impact on health inequalities
About this item
- Title
- Proportionate universalism in practice? A quasi-experimental study (GoWell) of a UK neighbourhood renewal programme’s impact on health inequalities
- Content partner
- University of Canterbury Library
- Collection
- UC Research Repository
- Description
© 2016 The Authors. Recommendations to reduce health inequalities frequently emphasise improvements to socio-environmental determinants of health. Proponents of 'proportionate universalism' argue that such improvements should be allocated proportionally to population need. We tested whether city-wide investment in urban renewal in Glasgow (UK) was allocated to 'need' and whether this reduced health inequalities. We identified a longitudinal cohort (n = 1006) through data linkage across survey...
- Format
- Research paper
- Research format
- Journal article
- Date created
- 2016
- Creator
- Egan M / Kearns A / Kattikreddi SV / Curl A / Lawson K / Tannahill C
- URL
- http://hdl.handle.net/10092/15648
- Related subjects
- UK / Neighbourhood renewal / Health inequalities / Proportionate universalism / Natural experiment / Built environment and design / Urban and regional planning / Urban and regional planning not elsewhere classified / Medical and Health Sciences / Public Health and Health Services / Health and Community Services
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 15 July 2018, and updated 01 June 2025.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
What is the copyright status of this item?

Share, Modify, Use commercially
See below for specifics about how you may use this item.

More Information
University of Canterbury Library has this to say about the rights status of this item:
0277-9536/© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
What can I do with this item?
You must always check with University of Canterbury Library to confirm the specific terms of use, but this is our understanding:

Non-infringing use
NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.

Share it
This item is suitable for copying and sharing with others, without further permission.

Modify it
This item is suitable for modifying, remixing and building upon, without further permission.

Use it commercially
This item is suitable for commercial use, without further permission.
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 15 July 2018, and updated 01 June 2025.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
Related items
Loading...