Research paper
Comparison of risk-of-bias assessment approaches for selection of studies reporting prevalence for economic analyses.
About this item
- Title
- Comparison of risk-of-bias assessment approaches for selection of studies reporting prevalence for economic analyses.
- Content partner
- The University of Auckland Library
- Collection
- ResearchSpace@Auckland
- Description
ObjectivesWithin cost-effectiveness models, prevalence figures can inform transition probabilities. The methodological quality of studies can inform the choice of prevalence figures but no single obvious candidate tool exists for assessing quality of the observational epidemiological studies for selecting prevalence estimates. We aimed to compare different tools to assess the risk of bias of studies reporting prevalence, and develop and compare possible numerical scoring systems using these t...
- Format
- Research paper
- Research format
- Journal article
- Date created
- 2020-9-16
- Creator
- Glasgow, Matthew J / Edlin, Richard / Harding, Jane E
- URL
- https://hdl.handle.net/2292/58110
- Related subjects
- Humans / Prevalence / Infant, Newborn / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Bias / health economics / statistics & research methods / Science & Technology / Life Sciences & Biomedicine / Medicine, General & Internal / General & Internal Medicine / MEDICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS / NEONATAL HYPOGLYCEMIA / NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES / FOLLOW-UP / SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS / GLYCEMIA / INFANTS / PRIMER / INJURY / MRI / 1402 Applied Economics / 1117 Public Health and Health Services / Health services & systems / Public Health / 1103 Clinical Sciences / 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 06 February 2022, and updated 18 August 2023.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
What is the copyright status of this item?

Share, Modify
See below for specifics about how you may use this item.

More Information
The University of Auckland Library has this to say about the rights status of this item:
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
You can learn more about the rights status of this item at:
What can I do with this item?
You must always check with The University of Auckland Library to confirm the specific terms of use, but this is our understanding:

Non-infringing use
NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.

Share it
This item is suitable for copying and sharing with others, without further permission.

Modify it
This item is suitable for modifying, remixing and building upon, without further permission.

No commercial use
You may not use this item commercially.
What can I do with this item?
Check copyright status and what you can do with this item
Check informationReport this item
If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item
Report this itemDigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 06 February 2022, and updated 18 August 2023.
Learn more about how we work.
Share
Related items
Loading...