Research paper

Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial

View original item

About this item

Title
Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial
Content partner
University of Canterbury Library
Collection
UC Research Repository
Description

Background: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. Methods and design: The CURE RCT...

Format
Research paper
Research format
Journal article
Date created
2020
Creator
Kim KT / Morton S / Howe S / Chiew YS / Desaive T / Benyo B / Szlavecz A / Moeller K / Shaw, Geoff / Knopp, Jennifer / Docherty, Paul / Pretty, Christopher / Chase, Geoff
URL
https://hdl.handle.net/10092/102041
Related subjects
Respiratory System / Humans / Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult / Oxygen / Breath Tests / Respiration, Artificial / Positive-Pressure Respiration / Oxygen Consumption / Computer-Aided Design / Middle Aged / Female / Male / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic / Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury / Outcome Assessment, Health Care / ARDS / mechanical ventilation / pulmonary mechanics / RCT / PEEP titration / Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology / Clinical Sciences / Biomedical and clinical sciences / Clinical sciences / Intensive care / Cardiovascular medicine and haematology / Respiratory diseases / Engineering / Biomedical engineering / Computational physiology

What can I do with this item?

Check copyright status and what you can do with this item

Check information

Report this item

If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item

Report this item

DigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 25 October 2022, and updated 01 March 2025.
Learn more about how we work.

Share

What can I do with this item?

You must always check with University of Canterbury Library to confirm the specific terms of use, but this is our understanding:

Research icon

Non-infringing use

NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.

NZ Copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.

No sharing icon

No sharing

You may not copy and/or share this item with others without further permission. This includes posting it on your blog, using it in a presentation, or any other public use.

You may not copy and/or share this item with others without further permission. This includes posting it on your blog, using it in a presentation, or any other public use.

No modifying icon

No modifying

You are not allowed to adapt or remix this item into any other works.

You are not allowed to adapt or remix this item into any other works.

No commercial use icon

No commercial use

You may not use this item commercially.

You may not use this item commercially.

View original item

What can I do with this item?

Check copyright status and what you can do with this item

Check information

Report this item

If you believe this item breaches our terms of use please report this item

Report this item

DigitalNZ brings together more than 30 million items from institutions so that they are easy to find and use. This information is the best information we could find on this item. This item was added on 25 October 2022, and updated 01 March 2025.
Learn more about how we work.

Share

Related items

Loading...